This tool predicts ground settlement and potential building damage in both the short and long term, based on the method from Burland et al.'s 1977 paper: Prediction of Ground Movements and Assessment of Risk of Building Damage Due to Bored Tunnelling.
This template is not available yet. You can sign up and create it yourself!
Or let us know if you'd like to be notified when it’s ready:
Your request has been received. We will let you know when it is available.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Get started with your design
Bored Tunnelling Ground Impact Assessment is a specialized tool for predicting ground settlement and potential building damage due to bored tunneling activities. Using the method outlined in Burland et al.'s 1977 paper, Prediction of Ground Movements and Assessment of Risk of Building Damage Due to Bored Tunnelling, it estimates both short-term and long-term impacts on surrounding structures, allowing users to assess risk and design accordingly.
This tool is for:
- Geotechnical Engineers – requiring accurate predictions of ground movement to mitigate risk and inform design strategies for tunneling projects near existing structures.
- Structural Engineers – assessing potential impacts of settlement on building integrity, especially for projects in urban or sensitive environments.
- Urban Planners – evaluating the safety and feasibility of tunneling projects in densely populated areas, where infrastructure protection is crucial.
By offering a detailed assessment of potential impacts, this tool enables users to conduct comprehensive feasibility studies and support decisions that protect buildings from tunneling-induced settlement. This parametric technical document is essential for risk mitigation in design stages, improving project safety and long-term stability.
Engineering templates
Common calculators
Design guides
FAQs
Why is long-term settlement assessment important for urban tunneling projects?
Long-term assessments help evaluate risks to buildings from delayed settlement, ensuring safety and stability well beyond the initial tunneling phase.
What types of buildings are most at risk from tunneling-induced settlement?
Older, unreinforced masonry buildings and structures on shallow foundations are generally more vulnerable to damage from ground settlement.
Are there alternative methods to Burland’s approach for assessing ground impact?
Yes, other empirical and analytical models exist, but Burland’s method remains widely used for its practical balance between complexity and accuracy.
Learn about the benefits of using CalcTree on engineering projects!
How to prepare an engineering report
Engineering reports require a balance of clarity, precision, and professionalism. Here are some best practices for preparing a report we use at CalcTree:
- Clear and visual: Use heading types to establish a logical structure, add diagrams for clarity.
- Integrate sources: Map data from your calculation tools such as spreadsheet or Python to your report.
- Units: Assign units to physical quantities.
- Compliance: State and hyperlink the relevant codes of practices.
- Peer review: Share a link to your page with team members for reviews and feedback.
For more on verification, see CalcTree’s internal methods.
